Comments:
First day SuSE packages broken - Anonymous - 2002-08-10
Please note that SuSE packages created before 9th August are missing some files for KWord and should be considered broken. Fixed packages are already available on some ftp mirrors but other still carry at the moment of this posting the broken versions.
Re: First day SuSE packages broken - Evan "JabberWokky" E. - 2002-08-12
Okay - dumb question - how do I tell which ones I installed?
rpm -qa |grep -i koffice
koffice-devel-1.2rc1-18
koffice-1.2rc1-18
--
Evan
Re: First day SuSE packages broken - Anonymous - 2002-08-12
Revisions 18+ for i386 and 7+ for ppc are fixed. The broken packages had revisions from 0 to 2 AFAIR.
Missing library requirement - Anonymous - 2002-08-10
Seems like libart is missing in the requirements list. If you install a binary package don't forget to download and install the provided libart package. If you compile from source, you can download libart at
<A href="http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/pre-gnome2/sources/libart_lgpl/libart_lgpl-2.3.8.tar.gz">libart_lgpl-2.3.8.tar.gz</a>.
gnome.org? - me - 2002-08-10
gnome.org? - is this cooperation between KDE and gnome for once?
Re: gnome.org? - Anonymous - 2002-08-10
libart is hosted in Gnome CVS, dunno you can call it a Gnome project. KDE and Mozilla use it just like any other library.
Re: gnome.org? - JC - 2002-08-11
Look for wvWare which is also kde-gnome. But mostly from kde people.
Re: gnome.org? - Anon - 2002-08-12
wvware mostly KDE people?
dont let the maintainer Dom Lachowicz hear you say that.
Re: gnome.org? - Dom Lachowicz - 2002-08-12
Hehe :)
wvWare 1.0 is and was written by (and is maintained by) people closely associated with the AbiWord project, which I also happen to maintain. Not to mention its libole2 dependency that we helped write as well as the scaled-back Glib that I rewrote.
wvWare 2.0 was a stalled collaboration between the KOffice folks and myself, of which the KDE folks did most of the work thus far. Please note that 'thus far' in this case means "no where near functional." Werner, David Faure and a few Gnomies (myself included) chatted on IRC this weekend. Shaheed Hacque couldn't attend, unfortunately. Anyway, we talked about reviving the project, future plans, licensing, APIs, dependencies/requirements (such as libole2's replacement, libgsf - maintainer and lead author/architect Jody Goldberg[gnumeric], coauthored by me), division of labor, etc... and things seemed to go well. I'm only hoping that this turns out better than things did last summer.
I am very much wvWare 1.0's current author and maintainer (mad props go to Caolan McNamara, though, for all of his hard work). wvWare 2.0 is very much incomplete and in a state flux, though it will be a teriffic product when it is finished. We hope to make it as good as, if not better than, wvWare 1.0 in a short amount of time.
Cheers,
Dom
Re: gnome.org? - JC - 2002-08-13
Oops, sorry :-)
Re: Missing library requirement - Vern Hoxie - 2005-10-06
How do I obtain a copy of libART as required by KDE 3.4.2?
ver
Re: Missing library requirement - Mark Shelby - 2005-12-03
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libart_lgpl/2.3/libart_lgpl-2.3.8.tar.gz
Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - ac - 2002-08-10
I just want to say a HUGE "thank you!" to whoever worked to put together the RedHat RPMS. I never thought I'd ever actually see links in the KDE announcement. Thankyouthankyouthankyou.
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Anonymous - 2002-08-10
Jarl E. Gjessing, the same guy who recently contributed KDE 3.0.2 packages for Red Hat 7.3 (even in i386 and i686 versions).
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Bill - 2002-08-10
And you know what's even cooler? You can apt-get them. Get it setup at freshrpms.net and then point to the appropriate www.math.unl.edu directories.
Later.
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - ac - 2002-08-10
I seem to be missing a dependency:
kdegraphics >= 3.0.2 is needed by koffice-1.2-1
Any ideas where I can get this RedHat RPM? The unl directories don't have this. I can't even find this on RawHide! Should I just --nodeps it?
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Jarl E. Gjessing - 2002-08-10
I made these packages with my kde-3.0.2 packages installed.
I could give any guaranties that they would work with older KDE versions, so I made the koffice package dependant to my own kde version.
This version is downlodable from KDE's ftp sites/mirrors and they are placed in the RedHat-Unofficial
directory.
koffice problems - crazycrusoe - 2002-08-11
i am running redhat 7.3 with kde 3.1 stuff, after i intalled the koffice rpm provided from redhat, any koffice application gives me
================================
Mutex destroy failure: Device or resource busy
================================
any ideas on what to do ??
thanks
Re: koffice problems - Rex Dieter - 2002-08-11
My suggestion would be to get rid of the kde 3.1 bits, and downgrade to kde 3.0.2.
Re: koffice problems - Anonymous - 2002-08-14
I have the same problems w/ teh mutex destroy message. I"ve installed kde and koffice by using rex's apt source on an rh7.3 box.
apt-get install kde3
apt-get install koffice
opening any koffice application gives me the error.
any other ideas?
thanks!
Re: koffice problems - Rex Dieter - 2002-08-17
I think I've finally squashed the "mutex detroy" error problem. Try
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
to get the latest version.
Re: koffice problems - Evan Moseman - 2002-12-11
What is apt-get update? Is that an application?
Thanks, I've run into the same problem...
--
Evan
Re: koffice problems - Rex Dieter - 2002-12-12
Yes, apt is a rpm dependancy resolution tool and greatly eases the task of keeping your machine up-to-date. For more details about the use of apt to keep your KDE current, check out http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/
Re: koffice problems - JP - 2003-01-07
running (or trying to) the Koffice 1.2-0.rc1.4 on RedHat 8.0. I got the mutex error. I can't find any .desktop files in $HOME. I installed apt and updated things a bit (but nothing for kde/koffice came up). Koffice still yields the mutex error.
any more ideas?
what did apt upgrade for you all?
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Rex Dieter - 2002-08-11
FYI, the KDE 3.0.2 (including koffice-1.2rc1) RPMS referenced on my website, http://www.math.unl.edu/~rdieter/ are *not* the same as the "unofficial" redhat kde 3.0.2 rpms available from http://www.kde.org/
-- Rex
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Jarl E. Gjessing - 2002-08-11
As far as I can see, you're packages are RawHide packages with you're own patches!!??
The meaning with my packages was, to make then run on a std. RedHat-7.2 without having to apply a plethora of new packages.
I have tried to install the RawHide packages on my machine, and the dependency problem was a nightmare, but then again, the RawHide is not meant for production or stable workstation, but for developers and tasters (correct me if I'm wrong).
In fact the user dont have to download any packages other than the KDE packages, and just use packages delivered woth RedHat, this makes it an ease to install.
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Jarl E. Gjessing - 2002-08-11
Sorry, I meant testers not tasters :-)
Re: Wait a second...WHICH distributions?!? - Rex Dieter - 2002-08-11
I ported the rawhide packages to RedHat 7.2/7.3, yes. I chose this so the kde I (and my department used) would mirror redhat's development (and redhat 8.0) as close as possible (and I get the advantage of seeing/watching redhat's bug-tracking via bugzilla.redhat.com).
As for dependancies, well, yes, there are some, and that's one reason why I my kde rpms are apt'able (apt-get), so that dependancies are handled for you.
debian packages - deucalion[tpoc] - 2002-08-10
.... are there any debian (3.0*) packages available too .. ?
thx,
deucalion
Re: debian packages - Anonymous - 2002-08-10
Not yet, watch http://people.debian.org/~bab/kde3/
Re: debian packages - deucalion[tpoc] - 2002-08-11
thx!
Re: debian packages - Johannes Wilm - 2002-08-12
its no problem compiling them though. just add an extra entry to the /debian/changelog and go "dpkg-builtpackage" in the packages root-dir. (I tried it today). the only thng you need to make sure is that you have libxslt1-dev installed before compiling. For all other dependencies you should get error-messages rather in the beginning, but for this one, you don*t get before some time at the end of the built-process.
it's a great release - happy user - 2002-08-10
I can load my koffice 1.1 work without any problem and all visual glitches have been settled. I just love the frames. Great work. a huge thx.
word filters - me - 2002-08-10
Can koffice export to MS Word .doc yet?
Re: word filters - me - 2002-08-10
shouldn't reply to my own post, but i found the filters status page (http://www.koffice.org/filters/status.phtml).
.doc import but no export (this wouldn't be so bad if rtf support was good, but apparently both import/export are alpha)
.xls import, no export (kspread)
powerpoint import (alpha), no export (kpresenter)
Are people working on these export filters? (as much as we might hate it MS's file formats are the standard these days - i apply for a job, they ask me to email my cv in .doc format) Also is anyone working on OpenOffice import/export filters? (probably the second most important file format to support)
Re: word filters - ariya - 2002-08-10
KOffice is still lack of developers. Visit the filters status page, then go on to each filter, then count how many (part-time) developers are working on it. Filters will be substantially improved, but if only KOffice gets more help (code/test/money/etc)
Re: word filters - Morty - 2002-08-10
Oh how I hate all this jabbing about filters, like when you see a reviw of a office program you realy get a rant of how good/bad the filters are and not the more important: the use and fuctionality of said program. If people could start to think they vould see filters are NOT the be all for a package, but more a nice to have feature. Back in the old days World Perfect had closer to 90% of the wordprocessor market and Lotus 1-2-3 nearly the same for spreadsheets, but now Word and Exel have taken their places. This was not becouse of supperior filters I can tell you, you usaually got the text and mostly the pictures/clipart but the layout and formating got more or less mangled every time and had to be redone.
Most of what you send/recive are ment as read only anyway, like your CV, and there Koffice realy shines thanks to the nice kprint framwork. Use PDFs, it's Adobes and realy not free but it's pretty close and cross platform. Besides I consider sending word/exel macroviruses very bad form:)
And if you recive lots of heavy formated doc/xls files, the crossover-plugin don't cost that much and ms-word and xl viewers are gratis dowloaded from M$.
If you have lots of docs you regulary edit/use or some big not finished docs, and you want to change app, you have the only big reason to need filters.
Re: word filters - me - 2002-08-10
I don't like recieving .doc's from people, but when i'm applying for jobs i'll do whatever they want - and most specify .doc's unfortunately
Re: word filters - Morty - 2002-08-11
Yeah, see the problem, have always hated the jobbhunting bit and this make it suck even more:) BTW have you tried to send a PDF anyway, with a polite note sayig you don't own word, but you could get back to them with a .doc file if they can't use the PDF (perhaps pointier to Acrobat reader). It's a gamble, but they would notice your application and thats usually good:) If one of the jobb requrements are ms-office skills, probably not:).
My last replay was mostly becouse today I read the second "test/reviw" of office progs. this week and both realy bolied down comparison of the filters, not what I was interested in (and consider more important) the usability, functionality, speed etc. Even payed for the crappy magazine:(
Re: word filters - A - 2002-08-12
On the other hand. Some do not accept doc-files because of the virus risc.
Pdf-files are always ok.
Re: word filters - beergeek - 2002-08-11
Oh how I hate when people tell me what features are important to me. For many people if they can't seemlessly send and receive word documents from co-workers/clients the office suite is useless. Count yourself lucky that these features are not needed by you. Sure there are ways to get around it (PDFs, txt files etc), but they are unwieldy and difficult to understand for non-technical people (What do you mean you don't have Microsoft Excel?). Until KOffice has a solid set of Import/Export filters it is simply unusable in most business environments.
Re: word filters - Eric Laffoon - 2002-08-12
> Oh how I hate when people tell me what features are important to me.
Really? Maybe there's a reason they tell you? In any case the point wasn't aimed at you. It was made in general. And it was a good point. Having good import and export without a solid feature set is a sure way to alienate everyone.
> For many people if they can't seemlessly send and receive word documents from co-workers/clients the office suite is useless.
Maybe so, which is why I specify koffice docs in my office. There's always openoffice.org if for some reason I have to sent to the brain dead.
> Count yourself lucky that these features are not needed by you.
Luck has nothing to do with it. It was freedom of choice... goes well with entrepneurial spirit. If you're counting on luck you're always going to be living off whatever people will hand you because ships don't come in that you don't send out.
> Sure there are ways to get around it (PDFs, txt files etc), but they are unwieldy and difficult to understand for non-technical people
What are you a troll?! Do you know how to use the KDE print system to print to PDF. For that matter Postscript and PDF are options with ghostscript printing for years. Although I don't run windoze I find it really difficult to believe they won't have a PDF reader (they're still free and very popular on the web) and that there won't be a pdf association that makes it a one click affair. Besides... Wurd docs may look different from system to system for settings or fonts where as pdf is... well Portable Document Format. Duh?
> (What do you mean you don't have Microsoft Excel?)
If you're ashamed of your computing choices switch... or did you already? I told a college student in the gym I used Linux and he looked at me with awe and asked "What make's it so great?". I tell other business people I don't use M$ software and they look at me like I had money falling out of my pockets and ask how I do it. I can assure you anyone who cuts the checks or hires the huge support staff is not going to scoff at you. However the ditzy secretary might... I'm sure you want to impress her.
> Until KOffice has a solid set of Import/Export filters it is simply unusable in most business environments.
Says you? I believe the previous poster was right. When Koffice produces a solid and usable suite that fits well within an organization it will be more widely used. It is more friendly and less bloated than OO and it has a lot of promise.
As for the filter issue, in case you're forgetting that Koffice is widely developed by volunteers, what is needed is for more people to step forward. I have my own project (Quanta) and I don't frankly care about the filters exporting because I'm sending PDF. If it means so much to you then I suggest you get off your ass and do something about it. Free software is about community. Everyone is welcome to use it but free software critics... may as well be freeloaders to complain about what is give to them for free.
What is really needed for document exchange is open formats, preferably based on XML. Your reasoning does not take into account that M$ changes formats regularly to force upgrades and to mess with competitors by keeping them on a treadmill. In fact M$ Office does not even do a perfect job with the overly complex and difficut format... which dumps out all kinds of personal information about you in plain text...
Thankfully the world is not entirely populated by people with attitudes like this that utterly assure the perpetual domination of M$. Your reasoning would nix Koffice if M$ Office had only a 25% market share. Fortunately other will take initiative on other critical issues where MS office is weak... like standards, unwillingness to fix long standing bugs, bloat, privacy issues and hideous costs.
BTW what I hate is people saying something in public forums that is poorly thought out and works to perpetuate the use of M$ software. The Koffice team has their priorities right.
Re: word filters - Edward Moyse - 2002-08-13
Eric Laffoon you are completely missing the point.
Lots of people (myself included) CANNOT ditch MSOffice because the most of the world assumes you can read .ppt and .doc. Sure it's easy to print to pdf in KDE but what good does that do me when the people I work with use Windows, Word, and Powerpoint? It isn't easy for them!
I think you're absolutely wrong to think that internal features are more important than filters - most people use a fraction of the capabilities of Word, and would never notice their absence. Not being able to read (for instance) the de-facto standard for presenting (.ppt) EVERYONE will notice.
I've tried KOffice and quite liked it, but until it has functional filters I'm simply not using it.
Thank heavens for openoffice!
Re: word filters - Thomas - 2002-08-12
Umh...
I'm running a small office with about 10 desktop linux pc for
half a year now (previously windows pc). There's no MS-Office
software, just OpenOffice...
We are constantly
recieving MS-Word .docs by mail, but in half a year there were only
about 5 .doc-files which could not be opened with OO...
most users like the system (because of easy e-mail handling and sweet
kprinter, everyone is sending .pdf-files now: it's fun. They even
use KOrganizer) There's only one user which is bitching about linux
all the time. If he get's an .doc-file which is not displayed 100%
correctly by OO he's always getting mad...
I'd really like to have 100% correct filters for MS-Office but this is
impossible. We'll have to live with it.
Re: word filters - Nicolas GOUTTE - 2002-08-10
You can consider the RTF import filter as being much more than "alpha".
However, the RTF export filter is not working correctly. (That is the problem of having lost a maintainer.)
As for whatever someone work for these filters, it is always problem: we are lacking manpower.
However DOC import, RTF export, OpenOffice Writer export and XLS import have good chances for KOffice 1.3.
Volunteers welcomed!
Have a nice day/evening/night!
Re: word filters - me - 2002-08-10
OpenOffice writer export would be a good start :-) - it has good .doc export, so could be used to do the conversion.
Re: word filters - RobW - 2002-08-10
No. See:
http://www.koffice.org/filters/status.phtml
Off topic - Bojan - 2002-08-10
Anyone got any idea what is happening to apps.kde.org? No new applications for what, 3 weeks??
Re: Off topic - Bojan - 2002-08-10
Sorry, I meant apps.kde.com
Re: Off topic - Anonymous - 2002-08-10
Read the lastest "News" entry there to get an idea.
Oh dear -- bad filters problem - ac - 2002-08-10
Don't worry, I'll file a bugreport on this, but...
When I try to open any Word document, I get "Could not import file of type application/x-msword".
The problem is that KWord sniffs MIME-types, and if the MIME-type is not on the "I have a filter for this" list, KWord doesn't even give you the option to choose the filter yourself (it doesn't even display it in the file-open dialog!). Thus, even though it has an "application/msword" filter, KWord isn't smart enough to know that "application/x-msword" and "application/vnd.msword" (I think) mean EXACTLY the same document format. There may be even more variations. Multiple MIME-types should be able to point to one filter.
At the very least, KWord should provide SOME sort of method by which a user can open their documents when KWord does have an appropriate filter, but the MIME-type sniffer doesn't know this. Along those lines, the file-open dialog should give the user the option to show all files regardless of MIME-type, so that they can choose the filter manually.
As the administrator of my home machine, I know I can work around this myself. However, I think KWord is far too confident in its MIME-type sniffer, and the need for manual per-MIME-type workarounds should be removed.
Re: Oh dear -- bad filters problem - ac - 2002-08-10
What's your work-around anyway ?
Re: Oh dear -- bad filters problem - ac - 2002-08-11
David answered this further down the thread. Go to KControl File Associations, create a new file association called application/msword and give it the same extension, applications, and embedding options as application/x-msword, then delete application/x-msword. Then log out and log back in again and you have it!
Unfortunately, this may need to be done for every MIME type you need to change. Fortunately, application/x-msword may be the only one you need to change.
Re: Oh dear -- bad filters problem - Nicolas GOUTTE - 2002-08-10
In short (for long, see: http://bugs.kde.org/db/46/46328.html ):
- The official KDE3 mime type for MS Word is application/msword
- Therefore it looks like a distribution problem.
- KOffice as KDE is based on mime types.
- The MS Word import is done by the OLE import filter. It needs to know what kind of file to expect.
Have a nice day/evening/night!
Re: Oh dear -- bad filters problem - David Faure - 2002-08-11
SuSE bug, IIRC. They renamed the mimetype.
Rename it back (file associations kcontrol module).
IIRC this is already fixed in SuSE.
Re: Oh dear -- bad filters problem - matthias - 2002-08-12
The problem is NOT suse.
>At the very least, KWord should provide SOME sort of method by which a user
>can open their documents when KWord does have an appropriate filter, but the
>MIME-type sniffer doesn't know this.
That is the bug.
If the user wants kwort to open file_xy with the word-filter then kword should do that. (In most cases the user is more intelligent then kword)
Re: Oh dear -- bad filters problem - ac - 2002-08-12
I hate to disagree with myself on this, but I think it's not necessarily a "bug" in the strictest sense of the word. If you want to push this idea, go ahead, but I think you should refer to it as a "feature" or an "enhancement".
Basically there are tons of MIME types, many of them totally erroneous, or at least outdated. As it was explained to me by one of the smart folks at KDE (who I actually believe!) there are only IANA-approved MIME types and then there is crap. KDE really only recognizes the IANA-approved MIME types properly.
Thus, with a properly-configured OS, this is not a bug at all. What we're talking about is a compatibility feature to deal with misconfigurations. Which is fine, too, if that's what you want. But it's certainly lower-priority than an actual bug. I'm quite satisfied with my bugreport being "closed". Feel free to differ.
Kontour seems to be totaly broken. - Zyzstar - 2002-08-11
Have you someone tried Kontour in this KOffice version? It seems that this package is totaly broken. I can't draw any lines, curves, bezier... - there are also tons of screen update bugs. Is the develompent of this application frozen or I'm missing something?
I'm using MDK-8.2 rpm package.
Re: Kontour seems to be totaly broken. - Jarl E. Gjessing - 2002-08-11
The RedHat packages's kontour works just fine.
I'm sorry to say this since this either means that it is the MDK packages or dependency problems on you're mahine
Re: Kontour seems to be totaly broken. - Jarl E. Gjessing - 2002-08-12
Ups I have to modify my comment.
Yes the lines dont work, I just read the header as if kontour did not work at all, so I tried it and I used everything BUT lines sorry.
I can see, that the status bar still shows the last selected, e.g. if you draw a reactangle and them select line, then the status bar still says rectangle mode.
Re: Kontour seems to be totaly broken. - Evan "JabberWokky" E. - 2002-08-12
Same with the SuSE packaged version. No lines work, and if a polygon crosses the bottom border as you drag it a large black rectangle rises up from that border.
--
Evan
Re: Kontour seems to be totaly broken. - Julien Olivier - 2002-08-12
Well, on Mandrake 8.2, I can't draw lines in Kivio 1.0 neither. So maybe it's a problem with QT (3.0.4) ? I didn't have this problem on Kivio 1.0 on Suse 7.3 (QT 3.0.3).
What is libwv2? - James Richard Tyrer - 2002-08-12
I downloaded KOffice from CVS KOFFICE_1_2_RC1 and I get this when I configure:
configure: WARNING: Could not find libwv2 anywhere, check http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/wvware/
{all one line}
Well, I have checked SF and this is only available on CVS.
Is this correct that it requires this??
Or, did somebody goof?
Or, was it my mistake to use CVS to download it??
--
JRT
Re: What is libwv2? - David Faure - 2002-08-12
Ignore that warning. This is a very alpha development (of a new msword import filter) that's not part of this release. Ok, warning disabled for 1.2-final.
CVS import bug - ac - 2002-08-12
Can KSpread now import CSV files of 100,000+ lines without locking up?
Re: CVS import bug - Peter - 2002-08-12
I haven't seen a bug report on this, so it doesn't seem to be a problem to anyone.
BTW: KSpread does only support 32,000 Rows, so how would you put in 100,000 lines?
Re: CVS import bug - ac - 2002-08-13
Thats the problem. It never imports them. When I tried to import a CSV file with about 100,000 lines, KSpread stopped responding (wouldn't redraw the window) and started using 100% CPU. I let this go overnight thinking it was just going to take a while to import, but in the morning, eight hours later, it was still using CPU and the window wasn't responding.
Re: CVS import bug - David Findlay - 2002-08-14
I've often noticed the KDE's error handling leaves a lot to be desired. For instance when my IMAP server was broken, any attempt to use it in KMail wyould crash Kmail. It would be nicer if it would provide an informative error message. Thanks,
David
Re: CVS import bug - Peter - 2002-08-15
Thanks for filing a bug report (I'm sure you did that!)
Re: CVS import bug - Matt - 2002-08-15
Hi,
I agree about the error handling, but really, to handle more then 20k lines of data, you don't need a spreadsheet, you need a database. A lot of people I'm sure would agree with that statement.
But then again, you'd need a tool to get this data into a database table.
On top of that, you probably want to manipulate that data.
To make a long story short, you need tools in between the data-file (csv, text, xml, ...) and the database table. Not just residing on mySQL, Oracle, or whatever, but on any database.
These type of conversions are done routinely in data warehouse projects. The converions are called ETTL: Extraction Transformation Transportation & Loading.
I'm proposing to write (in fact a large part of it is done) a tool for KDE called Kettle. Send me a mail by the end of september and we'll start hacking.
Until then I'll be off on my honeymoon.
Cheers,
Matt
http://www.ibridge.be/kettle/
Wide Page? - Navindra Umanee - 2002-08-12
Does anyone know why this page is so wide? Can't spot anything that would cause it.
Re: Wide Page? - Nils - 2002-08-12
At the top of the press release (line 56 of the page source), it says "<table [...] width="780" [...]>". Removing the width attribute seems to fix the problem.
Nils
Re: Wide Page? - Julien Olivier - 2002-08-12
Line 58:
<table border="0" cellapacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="780" align="center"><tr><td>
Just replace 780 by 100%.
Re: Wide Page? - Navindra Umanee - 2002-08-12
Thanks to both of you!
Command line error. - Tommy - 2002-08-15
Hmmm, has anyone seen this error:
"Mutex destroy failure: Device or resource busy"
What does it mean?
mmm. - lescrh - 2002-08-16
And krita??
Is included in the last release?
Re: mmm. - Evan "JabberWokky" E. - 2002-08-16
Not in the SuSE package, likely not in any. :(
Incidently, KThesaurus crashes on launch. I'm assuming that something that big is known.
--
Evan